C. B. Rane v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed summarily by single-judge bench because petitioner was absent and it did not appear to have been pursued for a long time.
What the court decided
WP 1922-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1922 OF 2014
C.B. Rane .. Petitioner
V/s
Union of India & Ors.
.. Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajinder Kumar with Mr. Dashrath Dube for the respondents.
CORAM: D.H. WAGHELA, CJ. & M.S. SONAK, J. DATE : 27th APRIL 2016
P.C.:
This petition does not appear to have been pursued for a long time. No one is present for the petitioner today when the matter is called out.
- Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the impugned order dated 19th August 2013 of the Central Administrative Tribunal is just and proper and that in any case, the petition is not required to be entertained.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.B. Rane
- respondent
Union of India & Ors.
Coram
D.H. Waghela
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Pardeshi Balkrishna Patil and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
M.I.Patel and Ors. Vs Dy. Registrar, Co-Op.Societies and Ors.
Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs National Insuranch Company Ltd. and Anr.
Anthony Lara Environment Soluntions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through the Municipal Commissioner and Ors.