In this order, the court accepted an affidavit statement regarding work completion timelines and disposed of the PIL by listing the matter for future compliance.
Matter listed for compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 62 OF 2012
Shri Rajendra Prasad Chaube .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Anil Yadav i/b Mr.D.R.Shah, for the Petitioner. Mr.G.W.Mattos, AGP for State - Respondent No.1. Mr.B.S. Nayak i/b Kiran Bagadia, for Respondent No.2 – MMRDA. Ms.Trupti Puranik, for Respondent No.3 – BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 14th SEPTEMBER, 2016
P.C. :
. Parties through their Counsel.
stating therein that after the monsoon, the work in question,
more particularly shown in Green colour in the Map annexed
with the said affidavit will be completed within a period of 2 months. We record the statement made on affidavit by
Mr.Sudhir Sudhakar Deshmukh, Executive Engineer, Road Development Division No. IV, Public Works Department, who is
1/2
also present in-person.
Petition. Let the matter be listed on 05/12/2016 for
compliance.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Shri Rajendra Prasad Chaube
The State of Maharashtra
MMRDA
BMC
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
