Disposed

Shri.Balwantrai Harilal Parekh(Deceased)Thr.Lrs.Paresh Balwantrai Parekh and Ors. v. Shri Eknathrao Khadse, Revenue Minister

Bombay HC8 Sept 2016CP/288/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench disposed of a contempt petition seeking extension of time to comply with a prior order directing appearance before the Revenue Minister. The court granted a two-month extension due to a change in the minister responsible.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition dismissed; period for compliance extended by two months to 28th September 2016.

Shri.Balwantrai Harilal Parekh(Deceased)Thr.Lrs… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2016)

p7-cp-288.2016.sxw

hvn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

CONTEMPT PETEITION NO. 288 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7504 OF 2015

¶7

Shri. Balwantrai Harilal Parekh

¶8

.. Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

Shri. Eknathrao Khadse

¶11

… Respondents

¶12

Mr. B.G. Lingade i/by Mr. D.S. Patil for the petitioner.

¶13

Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP fore the respondent State.

¶14

Mr. Kisanrao Palande, Desk Officer,Revenue & Forest Department present.

¶15

CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ. DATED : SEPTEMBER 08, 2016.

¶16

P.C.

¶17

Not on board. Taken on production board in view of the urgency.

¶18

Parties through their counsel.

¶19

We find that this court has disposed of the Writ Petition No. 7504 of 2015 by passing the following order :

¶20

“ (i) We direct the parties shall remain present before the Revisional Authority on 27^th August, 2015 at 2.30 p.m. The petitioner shall produce a photocopy of the revision application along with an authenticated copy of this order. The Revisional Authority shall endeavour to decide the revision application as expeditiously as possible in any event, before the end of the year 2015.

¶21

p7-cp-288.2016.sxw

¶22

¶23

(ii) If the Revision Application already decided, a copy of the order passed on the revision application be forthwith supplied to the petitioner.

¶24

(iii) All contentions on merits are kept open.

¶25

(iv) The petition is disposed of on above terms.”

¶26

It has been stated by the learned AGP on instructions, that the Revisional authority i.e. Revenue Minister has changed and another Minister has recently assumed the charge,in the circumstances, the order passed on 6.8.2015 in WP No. 7504 of 2014 could not be complied with within the time. A prayer for extension of time to comply with the order has made.

¶27

Keeping in view the aforesaid fact, we are inclined to dispose of this Contempt Petition by extending the period fixed in the said order by further period of two months from today. Petitioner to appear before the Revenue Minister on 28.9.2016 at

¶28

3.00 pm.

¶29

Contempt Petition stands disposed of.

¶30

(MAKARAND KARNIK, J.)

¶31

(SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)

Shri.Balwantrai Harilal Parekh(Deceased)Thr.Lrs.Paresh Balwantrai Parekh and Ors. v. Shri Eknathrao Khadse, Revenue Minister

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri.Balwantrai Harilal Parekh(Deceased)Thr.Lrs.Paresh Balwantrai Parekh and Ors. v. Shri Eknathrao Khadse, Revenue Minister

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmikant Sherkhane and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra through Office of Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Smt. Jayashri Mangesh Majukar and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Swarupa Ramnath Thorat and Ors. Vs Education Officer, Secondary and Primary School Zilha Parishad, Nashik and Ors.

Shri. Rajendra Dattatray Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra through Chief Secretary, Dept. of Higher Education and Ors.

Dayanand Nivrutti Badke Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Social and Tribal Development and Ors.

Shri. Ashok Vishwambhar Bodhale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Dept. of Marketing and Ors.