This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
PIL 12 of 2014
Vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 12 OF 2014
Samta Sainik Dal Through Executive Organizer, Mr. Deepak P. Dhabade and Anr. ...Petitioner
Vs.
Government of India and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner
Mr. N.C. Walimbe -AGP for the Respondent -State ******
CORAM : V. M. KANADE &
SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ
DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2016
P.C. :
appearing on behalf on behalf of Respondent No.9 had made a statement that Respondent No.3 would reconsider the complaint made by the Petitioner and, thereafter, pass a fresh order. This Court had directed Respondent No.9 to pass a fresh order after recording the reasons while
2/2
PIL 12 of 2014
disposing of the complaint. Thereafter, the Petitioner has not appeared before us. It is obvious that the Petitioner is not keen in pursuing this PIL.
SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J. V.M. KANADE, J.
Vaishali Tikam
Samta Sainik Dal Through Executive Organizer, Mr. Deepak P. Dhabade and Anr.
Government of India and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Smt. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
