High Court of Bombay dismissed this PIL filed in relation to a service matter on the ground that it could not be entertained.
The PIL is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 58.16-pil.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PIL NO. 58 OF 2016
Mr.Prakash Chimanlal Sheth. ... Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and another. ... Respondents.
Rahul S. Kadam for the petitioner. A.B.Vagyani, Govt.Pleader with C.P.Yadav, AGP for the State.
CORAM : D.H.WAGHELA, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK. J. DATE : 30th March 2016.
P.C. :
As the present PIL is filed in a service matter, the same cannot be entertained. PIL is dismissed.
(M.S.SONAK, J.) CHIEF JUSTICE
Mr. Prakash Chimanlal Sheth
The State of Maharashtra
D.H. Waghela
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
