Union of India and Anr. v. Shri Binay Pratap Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
dss
916-wp-2772-13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2772 OF 2013
Union of India and anr. .. Petitioners. vs. Binay Pratap Singh .. Respondent.
Mrs. N. V. Masurkar a/w. Mr. Vinod Joshi for the petitioner. None for the respondent.
CORAM: D.H. WAGHELA, C.J. AND M.S.SONAK, J. DATE : 30 MARCH 2016.
P.C.:
1] After the institution of this petition, the respondent has been transferred to Vapi. The challenge in this petition is to the order made by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in the matter of transfer of the respondent to Chennai. The transfer order was struck down, inter alia, on the ground that the respondent had not completed minimum period of service at a particular station.
2] In view of the subsequent developments, we are satisfied that the reliefs applied for in this petition have been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Union of India and anr.
- respondent
Binay Pratap Singh
Coram
D.H. WAGHELA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Smt. Rajani Gajanan Kamble Vs Union of India, Minister of Labour, through Secretary and Ors.
K-Lifestyle and Industries Ltd. Vs State Bank of India and Ors.
Shivaji S/O Waman Jadhav and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary and Ors.
Rohit S Pushkarna Vs Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. and Anr.