Dismissed
Suaukatali M. Betgeri v. State of Maharashtra and 2 Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/51/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Urmila Ingale IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 51 OF 2011
Shaukatali M.Betgeri .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Ms.Shobha Ajitkumar, for Respondent No.3 - BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 29th JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
. None appears for the petitioner. Earlier also no one
appeared for the petitioner. Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Shaukatali M Betgeri
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S Kemkar
M S Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court