The court allowed the Civil Application for restoration of PIL No. 133 of 2013 held on genuine grounds for the lawyer's absence and restored the case to its original number.
Civil Application allowed; Public Interest Litigation restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
8.CAI 176.14.doc
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 176 OF 2014 IN
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 133 OF 2013 Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani .. Applicant
In the matter between
Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani .. Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Ms.Minal Chandnani i/b Mr.J.S.Chandnani, for the Applicant. Ms.M.P. Thakur, AGP for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 29th JUNE, 2016
P.C. :
. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner/applicant
in Civil Application no. 176 of 2014 seeking restoration of Public Interest Litigation No. 133 of 2013. For the reasons
stated in the Civil Application, we find that the reason for absence of the Counsel when the case was called was genuine. Accordingly, Civil Application is allowed. Public Interest Litigation is restored to its original number.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of dismissal of the Civil Application for restoration should be set aside.
Hardas Hazarimal Tharwani
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
