In PIL No.25/2015, the petitioner requested an ACPI investigation due to disproportionate income allegations. The court noted the State had already granted permission for a discreet enquiry, satisfying the petitioner's grievance and disposing the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil25.15.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.25/2015
Rahul s/o Haridas Sahare ..vs.. The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Employment Guarantee Scheme, Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors.
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. M. K. Pathan, A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1, 2, 4, 13 and 14.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & V. M. DESHPANDE, JJ. DATE : JUNE 30, 2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner on the last date made a statement that the petitioner would be satisfied if the enquiry is conducted by the Anti Corruption Bureau inasmuch as there are serious allegations regarding acquisition of assets disproportionate to the known sources of income by some of the respondents.
Mr. Pathan, the learned A.G.P. has placed on record a communication addressed by the Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Amravati Division, Amravati thereby granting permission to the District Superintendent of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau to conduct a discreet enquiry into the allegations regarding acquisition of assets disproportionate to the known source of income.
In that view of the matter, grievance of the petitioner does not survive. Hence, the Public Interest Litigation is disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
kahale
Rahul s/o Haridas Sahare
The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary, Department of Employment Guarantee Scheme
B. R. Gavai
V. M. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
