The High Court granted leave to withdraw a public interest litigation. The petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Prodn-1-PIL-198-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.198 OF 2013
Shri Chengde Shashikant Premraj Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Petitioner
..Respondents
Mr. Tejesh Dande, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Coram : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, JJ. Date : 27th APRIL, 2016.
P. C. :
Not on board. Mentioned for urgent Production. Production granted in view of urgency.
The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Leave granted. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]
1/1
Shivgan
Shri Chengde Shashikant Premraj
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Ranjit More
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
