Disposed
Arpit Jagdish Minase, and Another v. the State of Maharshtra, through Its Secretary, Dept. Mumbai and 3 Others
Bombay HCPIL/51/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil51-15.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No.51 OF 2015
Arpit Jagdish Minase and another.
-Vrs.-
State of Mah. Through its Secretary and others.
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. P.B. Patil, counsel for petitioner. Mr. P.D. Thakre, AGP for respondent nos. 1 to 5. Mrs. Chandurkar, counsel for respondent no. 6.
CORAM : B.R. GAVAI AND P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ . DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2016
The learned counsel for the Union of India states that the road is already repaired and the process for widening of the road has already commenced.
Petition is disposed of accepting the statement made on behalf of the learned counsel for Union of India as the purpose of the petition is served.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Hirekhan
Arpit Jagdish Minase
State of Mah.
B.R. GAVAI
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court