The High Court of Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 183 of 2011 for want of prosecution as no parties appeared for the petitioner and the BMC had entered no argument.
Petitioner was denied leave to proceed with the writ petition due to want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 183 OF 2011
Shri Chatur Asaram Galhate .. Petitioner
Vs.
The Commissioner, Mumbai Municipal Corporation and ors. .. Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Ms.Geeta Joglekar, for BMC.
CORAM : SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 01st AUGUST, 2016
P.C. :
. None for the petitioner. Writ Petition is dismissed
for want of prosecution.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU.S.KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Shri Chatur Asaram Galhate
The Commissioner, Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Shantanu S. Kemkar
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
