Allowed

Shree Basveshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Education and Ors.

Bombay HC27 Apr 2016WP/7578/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge writ petition challenged the awarding of only 8 marks instead of 10 to the petitioner for having its own school premises. The High Court observed a precedent awarding full marks to schools with registered gift deeds without requiring 7/12 extracts. Consequently, the Court directed respondents to award the full 10 marks under the head Place to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 directed to award full marks of 10 under the head 'Place' to the Petitioner.

Shree Basveshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vs the… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

wp-7578/15.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 7578 OF 2015

¶4

Shree Basveshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Mali Nagar Versus State of Maharashtra & Others.

¶5

..Petitioner.

¶6

..Respondents.

¶7

Mr. A. D. Sale for the Petitioner. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondents.

¶8

Coram : SHANTANU KEMKAR & RANJIT MORE, JJ. Date : April 27, 2016 .

¶9

P. C. :

¶10

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Since the

¶11

issue involved is in narrow compass, by consent of parties, the matter is immediately taken up for final hearing.

¶12

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.

¶13

According to the Petitioner, the Petitioner has not been awarded adequate marks for having own place for starting a school. He submits that the Petitioner has submitted a giftdeed and by treating it to be a lease-deed, instead of 10 marks which are awardable, only 8 marks have been awarded to the Petitioner. He pointed out that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 have

1 / 2

patilsr

wp-7578/15.

taken a decision in the meeting held on 30^th May 2014 in the District Level Committee to award 10 marks to the schools having registered gift-deed even though 7/12 extract has not been produced and the fact of gift-deed has not been given effect in the 7/12 extract.

¶18

Having regard to the aforesaid decision and keeping in view the fact that the Petitioner has a registered gift-deed in its favour, in our considered view, the decision of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 of not awarding full marks to the Petitioner for having own place and awarding only 8 marks, treating it to be a lease-deed, cannot be accepted. Accordingly, we direct Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to award full marks, i.e., to the extent of 10 marks under the head “Place” to the Petitioner and proceed accordingly. With the above directions, petition stands disposed of.

¶19

[RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶20

[SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.]

¶21

2 / 2

¶22

patilsr

Shree Basveshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shree Basveshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Dhanwanti K. Nagpal Vs Ulhasnagar Municipal Corporation, through Municipal Commissioner and Ors.

Savita Vitthal Virkar Vs Member Secretary, District Selection Committee, Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur and Ors.

Vaibhavwadi Taluka Shikshan Sanstha through President/Secretary and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Ors.

Shree Basveshwar Shikshan Prasarak Mandal Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary, Dept. of Education and Ors.

Shri. Chengde Shashikant Premraj Vs State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary and Ors.

Sou. Vijaya Sukhadev More Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.