Petitioners sought leave to withdraw PIL No. 19 of 2012. The Bench found no notice had been sent to respondents and disposed of the petition while leaving substantive issues open.
PIL No. 19 of 2012 disposed; substantive issues remain open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-19.12
1
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.19 OF 2012
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
Ms. Radhika Sawant i/b Shri P.M. Havnur for the Petitioners.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & & P.D.NAIK, JJ DATED : 31ST MARCH 2016
P.C.:
. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that after filing of this Public Interest Litigation, there are many subsequent events and, therefore, the Petitioners do not desire to prosecute this PIL. In fact, on 19th April 2012, time was granted to the Petitioners by the first Court to take instructions as regards the withdrawal of this PIL. We have perused the orders passed in this PIL. This Court has not even issued a notice to the Respondents in this PIL. Hence, we dispose of this PIL. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in this PIL will remain open.
Petitioners
Respondents
A.S. Oka
P.D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court