This PIL is disposed of. The challenge fails as the Division Bench decision in Vijay Dinkarrao Shinde and Ors. V. State of Maharashtra and Ors. precludes it. Rule discharged.
Rule discharged with no orders as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil-19.02
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.19 OF 2002
Bhartiya Kisan Sangh … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Rushikesh Barge i/by Mr. Abhay Anturkar for the Petitioner.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2016
P.C.
. Our attention is invited to the decision of the Division
Bench of this Court to which one of us (A.S.Oka, J.) is a party. The said decision is in the case of Vijay Dinkarrao Shinde and Ors. V. State of Maharashtra and Ors.1 . In view of the said decision, the challenge in this Petition does not survive and accordingly, the Petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged with no orders as to costs.
1 of 1
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vijay Dinkarrao Shinde and Ors. V. State of Maharashtra and Ors.Distinguished¶1
Vijay Dinkarrao Shinde and Ors. V. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bhartiya Kisan Sangh
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
