Tadgaon-Khemwadi-Dudhani-Kotbyachiwadi (Tkdk, Vikas Parisar Vikas Sangarsh Samiti and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Revenue and Forests Dept and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RPIST. 27687-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (St.) No. 27687 OF 2016 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. 64 OF 2014
Vijay Krishnaji Sawant & Ors. … Review Petitioners
In the matter between :
Tadgaon-Khemwadi-DudhaniKotbyachiwadi (TKDK), Vikas Parisar Vikas Sangarsh Samiti … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. S. M. Gorwadkar i/b Sujay Gangal, for the Review Petitioners. Mr. Omkar Kadu i/b Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban, for the Respondent No. 1. Mr. N. C. Walimbe, AGP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. D. Dhanure, for Respondent No. 7.
Mr. Dhanesh Shah a/w P. S. Jetley, for Respondent – UOI.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Mrs. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 18, 2016 PC.
1 / 2
RPIST. 27687-16
an order dated 19.9.2016. It is submitted that in the said order the name of the counsel appearing for the Union of India is not shown in the appearance column. The name – “Mr. Dhanesh Shah, for Respondent No. 10 – UOI” be shown in the appearance column of the said order. Order dated 19.9.2016 is accordingly modified.
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
Vijay Krishnaji Sawant & Ors.
Tadgaon-Khemwadi-DudhaniKotbyachiwadi (TKDK), Vikas Parisar Vikas Sangarsh Samiti
The State of Maharashtra
Union of India
V. M. Kanade
Mrs. Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court