The petitioners did not appear. The High Court accepted the respondent's statement that the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act scheme was implemented and disposed of the petition by discharging the rule, subject to restoration conditions.
The petition was disposed of and the rule was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
wp-1915.01
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1915 OF 2001
A.K. Singh & Ors. … Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
WITH
CHAMBERS SUMMONS IN WRIT PETITION NO.214 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2399 OF 2003
Sukhmindar Singh Hundal … Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. F. Devetre, Senior Counsel a/w Ms. Samidha Vedpathak i/by Maneksha & Sethna for the Respondent Nos.4 and 5.
Mr. P.N. Modi, Senior Counsel a/w Mr. Rohan Kadam i/by K.D. Abichandani for the Respondent No.6.
Mr. M. Khan i/by Mulla & Mulla for the Respondent No.7.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2016
P.C.
1 None appeared for the Petitioners when the Petition was
called out yesterday. Even today none appears for the Petitioners. The
1 of 2
2 wp-1915.01
learned Senior Counsel representing the Respondent Nos.5 and 6 state that the entire Scheme governed by the order dated 30th January, 1989 (Exhibit – M to the Petition) passed in exercise of powers under SubSection (1) of Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 has been implemented. The learned Senior Counsel further states that the tenements which are required to be handed over to the State Government have been handed over and the requisite amounts have been paid.
2 We accept the said statements. By accepting the said statement, the Petition is disposed of. Rule is discharged. We make it clear that in the event the Petitioners apply for restoration, they will have to satisfy the Court that the cause of action still survives.
2 of 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.K. Singh & Ors.
Sukhmindar Singh Hundal
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
