Allowed
Anala Anirudha Pandit and Anr. v. Veermata Jijabai Techno Logical Institute and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCNMW/315/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
OF 2014.doc vks IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35 NMW 315 OF 2014.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.315 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1456 OF 2003.
Anala Pandit .… Petitioner. V/s. Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute and ors …. Respondents
Mr. Mihir Desai, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Rui A. Rodrigues, for Respondent No.2. Mr. M. D.Naik, A.G.P., for the Respondent-State. Ms. Amrita Sarkar, I/by Arqus Partners, for respondent No.1.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 17th MARCH, 2016.
P.C. :
For the reasons stated in the paragraph Nos 2, 3, 4 and 5 in
the affidavit in support of Notice of Motion, we allow this Notice of Motion in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b).
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1
Anala Pandit
Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute
Ranjit More
Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court