The High Court allowed Civil Application No. 2195 of 2015 in Writ Petition No. 419 of 2015. The court directed the petitioners to implead the applicant as a party respondent, ensuring he would not be affected by the outcome of the writ petition.
Civil Application allowed; Petitioners directed to implead applicant as party respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 CAW 2195 OF 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2195 OF 2015 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.419 OF 2015
Atmaram Kaluram Satav
.… Applicant.
V/s.
Madhuban Builders …. Respondents
Mr. D. A. Nalawade, i/by G. R. Golatkar, for the applicant. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, A.G.P., for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Vivek Kantawala a/w Amey Patel, Tanya Goveas, Pari Mohan i/by Vivek Kantawala, for the petitioners.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 17th MARCH, 2016.
P.C. :
applicant would be affected by the outcome of the above Writ Petition,
Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
respondent.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil application should be allowed as prayed in prayer clause (a).
Whether the petitioners should be directed to implead the applicant as party respondent.
Atmaram Kaluram Satav
Madhuban Builders
RANJIT MORE
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
