High Court of Bombay directed Respondent No.2 to decide Petitioner's application dated 3.3.2015 within three months without examining merits. Adjacent civil application was disposed of accordingly.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to decide Petitioner's application dated 3.3.2015 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7 WP 4368 OF 2015.doc
vks
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4368 OF 2015
Rakesh Govindram Singhal .… Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and ors …. Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2284 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4368 OF 2015
M/s Saraogi Corporation .. Applicant
in the matter of Rakesh Govindram Singhal .… Petitioner. V/s. The State of Maharashtra and ors …. Respondents
Mr. Hemant Ghadgigaonkar, for the petitioners.
Mr. V. M. Mali, A.G.P., for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Sneha Singh i/by A. M. Sarogi, for the applicant in Civil Application No.2284 of 2015.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 17th MARCH, 2016.
P.C. :
in our considered view, this petition can conveniently be disposed of by
1
7 WP 4368 OF 2015.doc
directing respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner's application dated 3.3.2015, copy of which is annexed as Exhibit “G”, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly.
[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be disposed of by directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's application expeditiously.
Rakesh Govindram Singhal
The State of Maharashtra
M/s Saraogi Corporation
RANJIT MORE
DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
