The High Court disposed of two consensually settled Notices of Motion filed by Endemol Nederland B.V. against Vedartha Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., accepting the agreed minutes and undertakings.
Notices of Motion disposed of in terms of consent minutes; undertakings accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905-NMS-1092-1616-2013.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1092 OF 2013
WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1616 OF 2013
IN
SUIT NO.555 OF 2013
Endemol Nederland B.V. And Ors.…Plaintiffs
Versus
Vedartha Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.…Defendants
Mr. Vaibhav Bhure, with Madhu Gadodia for the Plaintiffs.
Ms. Kavisha Shah, i/b India Law Alliance for the Defendants Nos.1
to 3.
Mr. Mahesh A., i/b Datta Dighe for the Defendant No.4.
Mr. Prakash Sawant, for the Defendant No.5.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:1st July 2016
PC:-
1.The parties have agreed to settle both Notices of Motion.
They have drawn up consent Minutes of the order. These are signed
by the Advocates for the Plaintiffs and the Advocates for Defendants
Nos. 1 to 5.
Page 1 of 2
1 July 2016
905-NMS-1092-1616-2013.DOC
2.The Notices of Motion are disposed of in terms of the
Minutes, which are taken on record and marked “X” for
identification.
3.The undertakings in the Minutes are accepted as
undertakings to the Court by the parties concerned.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 July 2016
Endemol Nederland B.V. And Ors.
Vedartha Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court