The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the absent defendant in a civil impugment petition, making the order absolute on the plaintiff's prayer.
The impugned petition was made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
914-LPETNL-66-2016.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LEAEV PETITION (L) NO.66 OF 2016
IN
SUIT (L) NO.228 OF 2016
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited…Plaintiff
Versus
G. Mahindra … Defendant
Mr. Raj Rao, i/b Banatwala Plaintiff.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:1st July 2016
PC:-
1. The Defendant is absent though served.
2. For the reasons set out in the Petition, it is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 1 of 1
1 July 2016
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court