Disposed
Manugraph India Limited v. Sigmarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and 9 Ors.
Bombay HCCHS/268/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
915-CHSL-268-2014.DOC
JSN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO.268 OF 2014
IN
SUIT NO.516 OF 2013
Sigmarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.…Applicants
In the matter
Manugraph India Limited.…Plaintiff
Versus
Sigmarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.… Defendants
Mr. Rohan Kadam, with Abhimanyu Khorote, i/b. Desai & Diwanji
for Plaintiffs.
Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar, with Ms. Cheryl Fernandes i/b ALMT Legal
for Defendants Nos.1, 3 and 4.
Mr. Prakash Sawant, for the Defendant No.5.
Mr. Swapnali Desai, i/b Mehul Shah for Defendant No.9
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 1st July 2016
PC:-
1.This is Chamber Summons by Defendants Nos. 1, 3 and 4
(“the Applicants”) for inspection. Ms. Kshirsagar for the
Applicants makes a statement on instructions that her clients have
been given inspection by the Plaintiffs of 584 separate drawings. On
behalf of the Plaintiffs, Mr. Kadam says on instructions that for the
purposes of the Notice of Motion, the Plaintiffs restrict their claim
Page 1 of 2
1 July 2016
915-CHSL-268-2014.DOC
and relief to these 564 drawings (of which inspection has been given
and which is recorded in the letter dated 31st January 2014 from the
Applicants’ Advocates).
2.The relief in the suit is wider and extends to several other
drawings in which the Plaintiffs claim rights. The Plaintiffs and the
Applicants agree that inspection of these additional drawings will be
given at the offices of the Plaintiffs’ Advocates on a date to be
mutually agreed. I am making it clear that when this inspection is
completed, I expect both sides to draw up an agreed list of the
drawings of which inspection has thus been given.
3.In addition, there are certain drawings in the custody of the
Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court. These are or were
the Applicants’ drawings. They were seized by the Solapur police
and are now in the Prothonotary and Senior Master’s custody. The
Plaintiffs and the Applicants will be at liberty to inspect those
drawings in the Court Registry after making an application for that
purpose on praecipe with a copy to the opposite side.
4.The Chamber Summons is disposed of in these terms. No
costs.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
Page 2 of 2
1 July 2016
Sigmarq Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Manugraph India Limited
G.S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court