Short order by the Bombay High Court condoning a three-day delay in filing an appeal, allowing the Notice of Motion, and disposing of the matter without further hearing.
Delay of 3 days in filing appeal was condoned; Notice of Motion allowed and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
906-nma.600.2015.doc
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.600 OF 2015 IN APPEAL (L) NO.276 OF 2015 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1211 OF 2012 IN SUMMARY SUIT NO.2526 OF 2009
Dinesh Chandra Maingi ...Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Dinesh Chandra Maingi ...Appellant Versus Shivkant V. Choudhary ...Respondent
Mr.Shanay Shah a/w Harshada Nagara i/b Joby Mathew and Associates, for the Applicant/Appellant
Mr.Saeed Akhtar, a/w Mr.Khurshood Akhtar, Mr.Hitesh Thorat, Ms.Pradnya Meshram, P.Pathak, Rechan Ansari, for the Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
906-nma.600.2015.doc
2/2
of Motion, delay of 3 days caused in filing the Appeal is condoned.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Dinesh Chandra Maingi
Shivkant V. Choudhary
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
