This single-order judgment condones a 28-day delay in filing the appeal, allows the notice of motion based on its prayer, and places the pending Suit No. 441 of 2000 on the Board for a date in January 2016.
Delay of 28 days in filing the appeal is condoned; notice of motion is allowed and appeal is placed on the Board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( NMA 1816 of 2015)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1816 OF 2015
IN
APPEAL (L) No. 398 OF 2015 IN
SUIT No. 441 OF 2000
Chanda C. Kadam and Ors. ...Applicants/Appellants Vs. M/s. Wellworth Developers and Ors. ...Respondents
...Applicants/Appellants
Ms.Sneh Mehta i/b. Wadia Ghandy & Co. for Appellants/Applicants Mr.Aspi Chinoy, Senior Counsel a/w. Birendra Saraf a/w. Pooja Kshirsagar a/w. Pratik Kothari i/b. Yogesh Adhia for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 11, 2016
P.C. :
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.] [ V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 28 days in filing the notice of motion should be condoned.
Whether the notice of motion should be allowed and placed on the Board.
Chanda C. Kadam and Ors.
M/s. Wellworth Developers and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
