Single Judge order condoning a 140-day delay in filing a review application against an order dated 4.7.2014, with no objection from respondents, and disposing of the application.
Delay of 140 days in filing review application is condoned and application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2015 IN
STAMP NUMBER (APPLN.) NO. 3384 OF 2014
DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND SDO, PONDA SUB DIVISION AND ANR., Versus MALINI VINAYAK NEVREKAR AND 2 ORS.,
... Applicants
... Respondents
Mr. S. Dhargalkar, Addl. Govt. Advocate for the applicants.
Mr R. G. Ramani, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J.
Date:26th February, 2016
P.C.
Heard Mr. S. Dhargalkar, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the applicants and Mr R. G. Ramani, learned Advocate appearing for the respondents.
MCA/96/2015
2
5. Application stands disposed of.
K. L. WADANE, J.
vn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 140 days in filing a review application against the order dated 4.7.2014 can be condoned.
DEPUTY COLLECTOR AND SDO, PONDA SUB DIVISION AND ANR.
MALINI VINAYAK NEVREKAR AND 2 ORS.
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
