In MCA/106/2015, the High Court at Goa disposed of the application by deeming service of notice on respondents 5 to 8, despite the lack of acknowledgment of receipt.
Applicant. Notice to respondents 5 to 8 deemed served.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 106 OF 2015
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 125 OF 2013
MR. JOSHEPH MICHAEL PEREIRA THROUGH P.O.A. MR.PETER RODRIGUES. Versus SMT. ELIZA A. M. COUTINHO (EXPIRED) AND 8 ORS.,
... Applicant
... Respondents
Mr. C. Padgaonkar, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. T. Kamat Ghanekar, Advocate for the respondent nos.2a,2(b)(i),(iii),2c.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J.
Date:26th February, 2016
P.C
Heard Mr. C. Padgaonkar, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant.
MCA/106/2015
2
deemed to be served.
K. L. WADANE, J.
vn
MR. JOSHEPH MICHAEL PEREIRA THROUGH P.O.A. MR.PETER RODRIGUES
SMT. ELIZA A. M. COUTINHO (EXPIRED)
RESIDUAL RESPONDENTS 5 TO 8
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
