9] It is well settled principle of law is that while dealing with the application for condonation of delay, the Court should not adopt most hyper technical approach. At the same time, it is also equally well established that the delay has to be explained reasonably. The length of delay is immaterial. However, its reasonable explanation is the only criteria to condone the delay. Here, in the present case, the ground on which the appellants pray to condone the delay is about the sickness of appellant no.1. From the reasons recorded by the trial Court, it appears that the appellant no.1 was hospitalised during the period from 15th May 2011 to 18th July 2011 and on 13th August 2011 to 7th September 2011. Thus, from the record it appears that the appellant no.1 was admitted in the hospital for some time. It does not mean that the appellants were unable to obtain certified copies of the judgment and order and to file an appeal particularly when they have represented the Execution Proceeding and they have contested the same. In such circumstances, it was possible for them to present appeal. Here in the present matter,
