The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed an application for the appointment of respondent no.6 as legal guardian of a minor legal representative, observing no objection from the opposing side.
Appointment of respondent no.6 as legal guardian of proposed legal representative no.5(b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 752 OF 2014
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 63 OF 2012
SMT. SARASWATI NARAYAN SHETGAONKAR AND 2 ORS., ... Applicants Versus SHRI.CHANDRAKANT S. SHETGAONKAR AND 11 ORS., ... Respondents
... Respondents
Mr. A. Shirodkar, Advocate for the applicants. Ms. V. Shetye, Advocate for the respondents.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J.
Date:11th February, 2016
P.C.
MCA/752/2014
2
K. L. WADANE, J.
mukund
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to appoint respondent no.6 as legal guardian of the proposed legal representative.
SMT. SARASWATI NARAYAN SHETGAONKAR
SHRI.CHANDRAKANT S. SHETGAONKAR
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
