The single judge allowed an application to add the words 'since deceased' against respondent nos. 7 and 8 and disposed of the matter.
The words 'since deceased' were added against respondent nos. 7 and 8.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 884 OF 2015
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2014
SMT.SUBHADRA NAIK GAONKAR (SINCE DECEASED) AND 12 ORS., Versus
SMT.FRANSQUINHA COUTINHO (EXPIRED) THR. LRS AND 13 ORS.,
... Applicants
... Respondents
Mr. Prasheen Lotlikar, Adv.for the applicants.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J.
Date:11th February, 2016
P.C.
Heard Mr. Prasheen Lotlikar, learned counsel appearing for the applicants.
This is an application for adding the words "since deceased" against the name of the respondent nos. 7 and 8.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed as prayed for. The applicants are permitted to add the words "since deceased" against the name of the respondent nos. 7 and 8.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
K. L. WADANE, J.
mukund
SMT.SUBHADRA NAIK GAONKAR (SINCE DECEASED) AND 12 ORS.
SMT.FRANSQUINHA COUTINHO (EXPIRED) THR. LRS AND 13 ORS.
K. L. WADANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
