In one paragraph, the High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Civil Application No. 156 of 2014, held to be infructuous following an order passed in the appealed appeal.
The civil application was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 156 OF 2014
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 45 OF 2014
SHRI JANARDHAN VASSUDEV VENZI NAIK.
Versus SHRI DIGAMBAR KRISHNA NAIK AND 5 ORS.
... Applicant
... Respondent
Mr. Joaquim Godinho, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Prasheen Lotlikar, Advocate for the respondent no.1.
Coram:K. L. WADANE, J. Date:11th February, 2016
P.c.
In view of the order passed in Appeal From Order No. 45 of 2014, application stands disposed of, as infructuous.
K. L. WADANE, J.
vn
Shri Janardhan Vassudev Venzi Naik
Shri Digambar Krishna Naik
K. L. Wadane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
