The review application filed in MCA32 of 2016 in Writ Petition No. 807/2015 seeking review due to no error apparent on the face of record being noticed is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MCA32-16.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
M.C.A.(Review) No.32 of 2016 in Writ Petition No.807/2015 (D) (Ku. Shubhangi Tejrao Deshmukh .vs. The Zilla Parishad, Buldhana and others. )
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. C.A. Joshi, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. G.G. Mishra, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2. Mr. S.J. Kadu, AGP for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : B.R. Gavai & P.N. Deshmukh, JJ. DATED : January 25, 2016.
No error apparent on the face of record is noticed warranting to invoke the review jurisdiction. The review application is rejected.
JUDGE
JUDGE
halwai
Ku. Shubhangi Tejrao Deshmukh
The Zilla Parishad, Buldhana
B.R. Gavai
P.N. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
