The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the notice of motion in Appeal (L) No. 502 of 2015, condoning a 34-day delay in filing the appeal by an arbitrator and disposing of the notices accordingly.
Approval of 34-day delay in filing appeal and disposal of Notice of Motion as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NMA. 1853-16
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No. 1853 OF 2016
IN
APPEAL (L) No. 502 OF 2015 IN ARBITRATION PETITION No. 1543 OF 2014
Eco Recycling Ltd. … Applicants / Appellants Vs. Key Note Capitals Ltd. … Respondents
Mr. Suyash Gadre i/b M/s. Utangale & Co., for the Applicants / Appellants.
Ms. Chaitrika Patki i/b Vidhi Partners, for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 PC.
. The delay of 34 days caused in filing the appeal is condoned for the reasons stated in the affidavit in support of the motion. Notice of motion is accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a).
Sd/Sd/[Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.] [V. M. KANADE, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
1 / 1
Eco Recycling Ltd.
Key Note Capitals Ltd.
V. M. KANADE
Smt. SWAPNA S. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
