M/S. J.B. Boda and Co. Pvt.Ltd. Vs C.I.T. B.C.I.

the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) seeks our opinion on two substantial questions of law as framed by it. However, Mr. Poojary, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant-assessee very fairly states that he is not in a possession of evidence to show that the Reference has been served upon the Revenue. This Reference is of the year 1999. In terms of

¶14

Rule 658 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, the party at whose instance a Reference has been made to this Court is required to take all such steps as are necessary to have a notice issued and served upon the opposite party within two months from the receipt of notice of

¶15

2

¶16

1022.itr-20.00.doc

¶17

the Reference from the High Court.

¶18

In view of the fact that the applicant-assessee has no evidence of having served the Reference upon the Respondent-Revenue, we are not inclined to examine the questions of law as raised for our opinion at the instance of the applicant-assessee. In the above view, the Reference is returned unanswered. However, it is made clear that the question raised hereinabove are left open for consideration in an appropriate case, if not already decided.

¶19

Reference is disposed of in above terms. No order as to costs.

¶20

Wadhwa

M/S. J.B. Boda and Co. Pvt.Ltd. v. C.I.T. B.C.I.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. J.B. Boda and Co. Pvt.Ltd. v. C.I.T. B.C.I.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Vijay Ravji Gajra Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income TAX-28 (3)

Shri Kunal Nimbaji Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri Kunal Nimbaji Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs New Era Talkies

The Commissioner of Income Tax -15 Vs Arlette Rodrigues

R.C.Diwan H.U.F. Vs the C.I.T.City-Xi