The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge certain orders. The High Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Writ petition withdrawn and dismissed; Civil Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rrpillai
907-caw-1990-2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7308 OF 2016
Shri Kunal Nimbaji Wagh
… Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1990 OF 2016 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7308 OF 2016
Shri Kunal Nimbaji Wagh
… Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Ms.Vrishali Raje i/b. Mr.P.N.Joshi for the Applicant / Petitioner. Mr.Sham V. Walve Respondent No.5.
Mr.J.Shekhar a/w. Mr.Akshay Kapadia ib. M/s.J.Shekhar & Co. for Respondent nos. 2 to 4. Mr.Asif I. Patel, AGP for State.
CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA &
A.K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2016
P.C.:
appropriate proceedings to challenge the impugned orders dated
1/2
907-caw-1990-2016.odt
rrpillai
19th May, 2016 passed by respondent no.1 – State of Maharashtra and 21st January, 2016 passed by respondent no.4 – Commissioner, Nashik Municipal Corporation.
dismissed as infructuous.
(M. S. SANKLECHA,J.)
2/2
Shri Kunal Nimbaji Wagh
The State of Maharashtra
M. S. Sanklecha
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
