The High Court recalled a prior dismissal of a writ petition and allowed a civil application seeking recall. Simultaneously, the petition itself was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant's counsel.
Civil Application allowed; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-caw-2019-2016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2019 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2917 OF 2016
Shri Vijay Ravji Gajra … Applicant vs. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax-28(3) … Respondent
AND
WRIT PETITION NO. 2917 OF 2016
Shri Vijay Ravji Gajra … Petitioner vs. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax-28(3) … Respondent
Mr.V.R.Kasle i/b. Ms.Meena Sharma for the Applicant/Petitioner. Mr.N.C,Mohanty for the Respondent .
CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, JJ. DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2016
P.C.:
dated 27th April, 2016 by which this petition was dismissed for non prosecution. The learned Counsel for the respondent has no
objection in allowing the application.
1/2
rrpillai
908-caw-2019-2016.odt
clause (a).
disposal at the request of the Counsel.
states that he seeks to withdraw this petition.
to costs.
(A.K. MENON,J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA,J.)
2/2
Shri Vijay Ravji Gajra
Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax-28(3)
M.S.Sanklecha
A.K.Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
