Apellant withdrew the appeal on maintainability grounds; by consent, time for filing evidence was extended by four weeks, and the notice of motion was disposed of.
Time for filing evidence affidavit and documents is extended by four weeks; notice of motion is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osapp153
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO.199 OF 2015 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No.1214 of 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.R.R.Salvi i/b B.A.Bhakad for the Appellant
Mr.Sunil Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.D.NAIK,JJ.
DATE : APRIL 12, 2016.
P.C.:
.Not on board. Taken on board.
1Heard the learned counsel for the
appellant and the learned counsel for
the respondent. The learned counsel
for the appellant is not pressing this
Appeal as it is not maintainable.
However, he prays that time granted by
the learned Single Judge to file
evidence affidavit, affidavit of
documents and compilation of documents
be extended. The learned counsel for
the respondent states that he has no
objection if a reasonable extension is
granted.
2The appeal is disposed of as not
2 osapp153
pressed. Time granted by the learned
Single Judge in terms of clause (2) of
order dated 22nd March 2016 is extended
by consent by a period of four weeks
from today. No further extension shall
be granted. Notice of Motion does not
survive and the same is also disposed
of.
(P.D.NAIK,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Appellant
Respondent
A.S.OKA
P.D.NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court