The Bombay High Court dismissed an interlocutory company petition upon the petitioner filing a settlement letter and seeking to withdraw the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 745-2016.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 745 OF 2016
ICICI Bank Ltd.
...Petitioner
vs.
M/s.Milestone Interactive Pvt.Ltd.
....Respondent
Ms.Tasneem Zariwala I/b. Vidhii Partners for Petitioner.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
16 DECEMBER 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the matter is settled between the parties and she places on record a “No Dues Letter” addressed by the Petitioner to the Respondent confirming full and final settlement. The letter is taken on record, marked “X” for identification. Learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the petition on the basis of this letter.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
ICICI Bank Ltd.
M/s. Milestone Interactive Pvt. Ltd.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
