The High Court of Bombay dismissed a Company Petition by leave, as the petitioner's dues had been settled out of court and they sought to withdraw the petition. No order as to costs was passed.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
Chittewan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO.266 OF 2016
Nitesh Estates Limited … Petitioner Versus Posterscope Outdoor Advertising Pvt. Ltd. … Respondent
Ms. Poorva Garg i/b Mulla & Mulla and Crai Gie Blunt & Caroe for the Petitioner.
Ms. Pooja Batra i/b M.S. Bodhanwalla for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.
DATE : 15 DECEMBER 2016.
P.C. :
. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner informs the Court that the Petitioner's dues have been settled out of Court and she seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
(S.C.GUPTE, J.)
Nitesh Estates Limited
Posterscope Outdoor Advertising Pvt. Ltd.
S.C.GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
