The Court allowed withdrawal of a company petition by the petitioner as the matter was settled out of court. The associated company application was disposed of as it no longer survived.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; the company application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 388-2015.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 388 OF 2015 AND
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 266 OF 2015
Voltas Ltd.
...Petitioner
vs.
Hiranandani Palace Gardens Pvt.Ltd. ....Respondent
Ms.Prerna Arora I/b. J. Sagar Associates for Petitioner. Mr.Utkarsh Srivastava I/b. Bharucha & Partners for Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
16 DECEMBER 2016
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner informs the court that the matter is settled out of court and that he seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. The company application does not survive and the same is also disposed of.
Certified copy expedited.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Voltas Ltd.
Hiranandani Palace Gardens Pvt.Ltd.
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
