The petitioner filed a company petition which was withdrawn after the parties settled the matter and the petitioner was paid the settlement amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
902.cp.712.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY PETITION NO. 712 OF 2015
M/s. Uniflex Projects Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs.
M/s. EK Stop Shop Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Jagdish Nagar for petitioner.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 3RD FEBRUARY, 2016
P.C.
matter and entered into consent terms dated 8.01.2016. The consent terms which is signed by the authorized signatory of the petitioner, the company and the advocate for the petitioner (the respondent has not engaged any advocate) is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
1/1
Shraddha Talekar PA
M/s. Uniflex Projects Pvt. Ltd.
M/s. EK Stop Shop Pvt. Ltd.
K.R. SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
