Allowed

Earnest Business Service P.Ltd. v. Hathi Finance Pvt.Ltd.

Bombay HC3 Feb 2016CA/225/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two company applications, the High Court of Bombay disposed of urgent prayers by the petitioners to allow the respondent to reconstruct and take on record consent terms filed in underlying company petitions.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the respondents to reconstruct the contents of consent terms dated 5th July 2003 and take them on record in Company Petitions No. 1084 of 2001 and No. 1085 of 2001.

Earnest Business Service P.Ltd. Vs Hathi Finance Pvt.Ltd. — Company and Corporate | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

7.ca.225.2015.cp.1085.2001=.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 225 OF 2013

¶5

¶6

COMPANY PETITION NO. 1084 OF 2001

¶7

Earnest Business Services P. Ltd. .. Applicant

¶8

In the matter between :

¶9

Hathi Finance Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. Earnest Business Services P. Ltd. .. Respondent WITH COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 226 OF 2013 IN

¶10

COMPANY PETITION NO. 1085 OF 2001

¶11

Earnest Business Services P. Ltd. .. Applicant In the matter between : Fedex Securities Ltd. .. Petitioner Vs. Earnest Business Services P. Ltd. .. Respondent

¶12

Ms.Aasifa Khan for petitioner. Mr.Anup Khaitan i/b Anup Khaitan & Co. for applicant.

¶13

CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 3^RD FEBRUARY, 2016

¶14

P.C.

¶15

1 Further to the order dated 20.01.2016, the counsel appearing for the

¶16

petitioner states that they have received a copy of the company application. The counsel states that the relief as sought in prayer clauses (a) and (b) in company application Nos. 225 of 2013 and 226 of 2013 may be granted.

1/2

Shraddha Talekar PA

7.ca.225.2015.cp.1085.2001=.doc

¶21

2 In view of the above, company application No. 225 of 2013 is

¶22

disposed of in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) which read as under :

¶23

(a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to allow/permit the respondent to reconstruct the contents of the said Consent Terms dated 5^th July 2003 filed before the Hon'ble High Court of Mumbai in Company Petition No.1084 of 2001;

¶24

(b) That the Reconstructed Consent Terms be taken on record of the Hon'ble High Court in Company Petition No.1084 of 2001.

¶25

AND

¶26

3 Company application No. 226 of 2013 is disposed of in terms of

¶27

prayer clauses (a) and (b) which read as under :

¶28

¶29

(b) That the Reconstructed Consent Terms be taken on record of the Hon'ble High Court in Company Petition No.1085 of 2001.

¶30

4 Ms.Aasifa Khan, Advocate appearing for the petitioner-company undertakes to file Vakalatnama within one week from today.

¶31

The undertaking accepted.

¶32

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

¶33

2/2

¶34

Shraddha Talekar PA

Earnest Business Service P.Ltd. v. Hathi Finance Pvt.Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Earnest Business Service P.Ltd. v. Hathi Finance Pvt.Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mandvi Co-Op. Bank Ltd. Vs Mayur Narendra Chandra and Ors.

.. Vs Mithilesh Umendra Mishra, (Debtor Own Petition)

Delta Power Solutions (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Microqual Techno Limited

Earnest Business Service P.Ltd. Vs Fedex Securities Ltd.

M/S Uniflex Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S Ek Stop Shop Pvt. Ltd. Cin No. U74120MH2012PTC226144

M/S.Prime Lasers, Propprimepack Containers Pvt.Ltd. Vs -Cleanroom Modular Systems Pvt.Ltd,(Formerly Known as Clestra Modular Systems Pvt.Ltd.