This single-line order directed the respondent institution to grant approval for the petitioner's appointment proposal within eight weeks. The writ petition was disposed of by the bench.
Direction to respondent no. 2 to take decision on petitioner's appointment proposal within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp10412.16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10412 OF 2016
Gulam Rasul Mohd. Gufran
.. PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & others
.. RESPONDENTS
Mr. S.S. Jadhavar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. K.N. Lokhande, AGP for the State.
=====
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2016.
PER COURT :
This petition can be disposed of by issuing appropriate direction to respondent no. 2 to take decision on the proposal tendered by the institution concerning grant of approval to the appointment of petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of eight weeks from today and, it is accordingly directed. Writ petition stands disposed of.
( K. K. SONAWANE ) ( R. M. BORDE ) JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Gulam Rasul Mohd. Gufran
The State of Maharashtra & others
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
