Gangadhar Vitthalrao Patil and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

¶1

1 cp 201.16

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 201 OF 2016 IN

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 3699 OF 2011

¶5

Gangadhar S/o. Vithalrao Patil and others.. Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

¶8

Shri V. D. Gunale, Advocate for Petitioners Shri N. B. Patil, A. G. P. for Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4. Shri S. G. Sangle, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3.

¶9

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 10TH JUNE, 2016.

¶10

PER COURT :

¶11

. We have heard Mr. Gunale, the learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Sangle the learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 and the learned A. G. P. for other respondents also.

¶12

The grievance of petitioners is that, this court has passed an order on 09th July, 2015 directing the respondents to pay additional amount of compensation at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of taking over possession on the amount of total compensation under the award. The court had not specified

¶13

2 cp 201.16

¶14

any time limit in the said order. The present contempt petition is filed on the ground that the order passed by this court on 09th July, 2015 is not complied.

¶15

The respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 have filed affidavit stating that as per the orders of this court the calculation have been made and the amount has been demanded. The same probably has been done in April, 2016.

¶16

Considering the above, now only payment is required to be made. We direct the respondents to make the payment expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (4) months from today. The Contempt Petition is accordingly disposed of.

¶17

[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]

¶18

bsb/June 16

Gangadhar Vitthalrao Patil and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gangadhar Vitthalrao Patil and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balasaheb Deorao Yadav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Suresh Nana Rohakale Vs Cidco of Maharashtra Ltd.

Kishanrao Jethuji Halde and Others Vs the Planning Authority and Others

Vaishali Nagsen Sarje Vs Nagsen Kondibarao Sarje

Madhavrao Sambhaji Birajdar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs Sardar Ajitsing Kehmsingh Loniwale and Others