Petitioner challenged refusal to allot newly created adjacent plots, claiming vested right as co-allottee of original plot. Court held plots were independent and saleable via auction, denying any preference. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP-8385.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8385 OF 2013
Suresh Nana Rohakale
...PETITIONER
versus
City & Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited
...RESPONDENT
Mr. S.G. Shinde, Advocate for petitioner Mr. A.S. Bajaj,Advocate for respondent
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATED : 9th JUNE, 2016.
Order :-
2 WP-8385.13
Murlidhar Shengale and he has right to claim adjacent odd shape plots, however, as submitted by respondent on affidavit that plots No. 308A and 308/B are independent and saleable plots, the petitioner cannot claim any vested right to purchase said plots as same are to be disposed of by auction.
Sd/-
Sd/-
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petitioner who was allotted a plot has a vested right of first refusal to purchase newly created adjacent independent plots created by the allotting authority.
Suresh Nana Rohakale
City & Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
