The High Court allowed the applicant's application seeking condonation of delay in filing a Family Court Appeal against an ex-parte decree obtained under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, citing medical evidence of major depression.
Condone of delay and the application is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 ca 1670.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1670 OF 2016 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL STAMP NO. 4037 OF 2016
Vaishali Nagsen Sarje .. Applicant
Versus
Nagsen Kondibarao Sarje .. Respondent
Shri V. D. Patnurkar, Advocate for the Applicant. The Respondent is served.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 10TH JUNE, 2016.
PER COURT :
. Though the respondent is served, none appears for the respondent.
2 ca 1670.16
could not get the knowledge of the judgment and decree immediately and thereafter the applicant was suffering from major depression. The medical certificate to that effect is annexed.
[ K. K. SONAWANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
bsb/June 16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vaishali Nagsen Sarje
Nagsen Kondibarao Sarje
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
