Petitioner's grievance in contempt petition becomes unsustainable as Scrutiny Committee has scheduled hearing, rendering the matter disposed of without formal order on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp12016.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.120 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7769 OF 2014
Hrishikesh s/o Girish Visave
Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.V.B.Garud, advocate for the petitioner Mr.P.S.Patil, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 & 2.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
A.I.S.CHEEMA, JJ. DATE : 24th February, 2016
PER COURT:
It is informed that petitioner has been called by the Scrutiny Committee for hearing on 09th March, 2016 and the matter would be decided by 16th March, 2016. The communication dated 23.02.2016, issued by the Scrutiny Committee, in that regard, is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.
In view of the statement made as above, grievance raised by the petitioner, in the contempt petition, does not survive. Contempt Petition stands disposed of.
A.I.S.CHEEMA R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
Hrishikesh s/o Girish Visave
State of Maharashtra
R.M.BORDE
A.I.S.CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
