Disposed

Rambhau Yeduba Bhadange v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC23 Feb 2016WP/1378/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition sought directions to release water from Upper Dudhana Medium Project for irrigation. The High Court was informed that water was released from 11th to 17th January 2016 to sustain Rabbi crops as per the Regional Committee's decision. The court held that the grievance does not survive and disposed of the petition, leaving any other grievances to be addressed by the concerned autho

What did the court decide?

No further relief granted; petition dismissed as the respondent acted in the interest of farmers by releasing water.

Rambhau Yeduba Bhadange Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2016)

¶1

Writ Petition No.1378/2016

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.1378 OF 2016

¶5

Rambhau Yeduba Bhadange ... PETITIONER VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and others ... RESPONDENTS

¶6

Shri G.B. Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.M. Kagne, A.G.P. for State Shri B.R. Survase, Advocate for respondent No.6

¶7

CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ. DATED: 23rd February, 2016.

¶8

ORAL ORDER :

¶9

The petitioner is praying for issuance of directions to the respondents to release the water from Upper Dudhana Medium Project, Tq. Badnapur for irrigation purpose as per the Regional Committee's decision dated 3.11.2015. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3, on instructions informs that, the availability of the water in the concerned Dam is to the extent of 49.57%. The Committee consisting of the Collector as well as the Divisional Commissioner has taken a decision to

¶10

Writ Petition No.1378/2016

¶11

¶12

provide for one rotation to facilitate sustainance of Rabbi crops and accordingly, the water is stated to have been released between 11th to 17th January 2016.

¶13

Since the respondents have acted in the interest of farmers and of released water from the Dam, the grievance raised by the petitioner in the instant petition does not survive. If at all the petitioner has any grievance in respect of non receipt of water for sustainance of crops in his field on account of any other reason, such as occurrences of breaches in the canal or illegal lifting of water by the agriculturists having lands at an upstream location or any such reason, it will be open for the petitioner to raise grievance with the concerned authority and if such grievance is raised, it would be appropriate on the part of concerned authority to look into it and take appropriate measures.

¶14

In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶15

(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.) ( R.M. BORDE, J.)

¶16

fmp/wp1378.16

Rambhau Yeduba Bhadange v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambhau Yeduba Bhadange v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrakant Narsing Rokde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Balaji Manikrao Pichrute Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sudhamati Pralhadrao Shrimane Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shantilal Avachit Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Usha Gajanan Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhagirathibai Babarao Hendre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others