The Court issued directions to the State Excise Department to decide the pending revision petition tendered by the Petitioner within three months from the date of the order.
Directions issued to Respondents 1 and 2 to decide the pending revision petition within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2054.16
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.2054 OF 2016
Sau. Usha w/o Gajanan Chaudhari,
R/o-Bodwad, Tq-Bodwad,
Dist-Jalgaon.
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra,
Through Secretary,
State Excise Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai-32
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.Ajay D. Pawar Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr.P.S. Patil, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 1 to 5.
...
CORAM: R.M. BORDE AND
A.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.
DATE : 23RD FEBRUARY, 2016
ORDER :
1. This Petition can be disposed of by issuing
directions to Respondent Nos.1 and 2 to take
decision on the Revision Petition tendered by the
Petitioner and pending with the State, as
wp2054.16
expeditiously as possible, preferably within the
period of THREE MONTHS from today and it is
accordingly directed.
2.With the directions as above, the Writ
Petition stands disposed of.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.] [R.M. BORDE, J.]
asb/FEB16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directions should be issued to the State Excise Department to decide the pending revision petition expeditiously.
Sau. Usha w/o Gajanan Chaudhari
The State of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, State Excise Department
R.M. BORDE
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court