Respondents admitted compliance with a prior order and offered an apology for delay. The Court disposed of the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
37-conpwl.84.2015.doc
1/2
nsc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (L) NO.84 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1852 OF 2015
Punjab National Bank ...Petitioner Versus Shah Mahendrakumar & Co. and Ors. ...Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Ms.Sapna Rachure, for the Respondents.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.
DATE : 5th JANUARY, 2016
P.C. :
submitted that the order passed by this Court has already been complied with. It is submitted that the delay caused in handing over the possession was on account of unavoidable circumstances and there was no intention
for committing breach of the order passed by this Court.
37-conpwl.84.2015.doc
2/2
non-compliance of the order dated 5th August, 2015.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
V.M. KANADE, J.
Punjab National Bank
Shah Mahendrakumar & Co. and Ors.
V. M. Kanade
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
